👋 Welcome Back

Quick check-in before we get into it —

Where are you right now with building your first AI workflow?

  • 🛑 "Haven't started yet — not sure where to begin"

  • 🔧 "I've got an idea but I don't have the time to actually build it"

  • "I've got something running — looking for what's next"

No judgment wherever you are. This issue is built to move you one step forward from wherever you're standing. Let's go.

🔥 This Week's Signal — The Agent Stack Just Got Accessible. That's Both Good and Urgent.

This was a big week. And I want to cut through the noise on what actually matters.

In the last seven days:

  • OpenAI shipped GPT-5.5 — a 1 million token context window, stronger tool use, and computer-use that works. Agent mode is now a dropdown in ChatGPT for Pro, Plus, and Team users. You don't need the API. You don't need an engineer. You open the app and assign it real multi-step work.

  • Anthropic launched Claude Managed Agents — long-running agents at $0.08 per session-hour plus tokens. What used to require enterprise infrastructure is now something a small team can deploy this afternoon.

  • Google's Cloud Next made it official: Vertex AI is now the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform. Workspace Studio lets you build agents across Gmail, Docs, Sheets, Drive, Meet, and Chat by describing them in plain English. 89% of business teams are already using AI agents. The average org runs 12.

That last number is the one I want you to sit with. Twelve agents per organization — average.

Not at the bleeding-edge companies. Not at the AI-native startups. Average.

So here's the question nobody's asking loudly enough:

If the average org is running 12 agents, who owns them? Who's governing them? Who knows what they have access to?

Gartner just updated its predictions for I&O teams: the interaction model is shifting from scripts and CLI to prompt engineering, policy definition, and workflow orchestration. That's not a 2028 problem. That's a right-now problem dressed up in analyst language.

The moat isn't building agents anymore. The moat is knowing how to govern, monitor, and operationalize them at scale — before your leadership asks someone else to figure it out.

If you're in IT or ops, that someone should be you.

🛠 Tool of the Week — Google Workspace Studio

What it is: Google's new no-code agent builder, launched this week at Cloud Next. It lets you build AI agents directly inside Google Workspace — Gmail, Docs, Sheets, Drive, Meet, Chat — by describing what you want in plain language. No API. No code. No engineering ticket.

Why it matters right now: This is the fastest path from zero to a deployed agent for anyone who lives in Google Workspace. You describe the agent, Workspace Studio builds it, and it runs inside the tools your team already uses every day. It also connects to 200+ models in Google's Model Garden — including Anthropic's Claude — so you're not locked into one model.

The IT use case: Build an agent that monitors your support inbox, categorizes inbound requests by type and urgency, and surfaces a summary to your team each morning. What used to require an n8n workflow and a few hours of setup is now a 20-minute build.

Who it's for: IT leads, ops managers, anyone who manages workflows inside Google Workspace.

Cost: Included in Google Workspace Business and Enterprise plans.

📋 Template Drop — Your Agent Governance Starter Prompt

This week's template is the Agent Governance Audit Prompt — use this to build a clear picture of every AI agent your team is running (or should be running) and who owns what.

It's the conversation most teams aren't having. Use it to get ahead of the one your leadership is about to start.

For IT leads and ops managers:

"You are an IT governance consultant. I'm going to describe the AI tools and workflows my team currently uses. Help me create a governance snapshot that covers: (1) what each agent or AI tool has access to, (2) what the blast radius would be if something went wrong, (3) which workflows have a human in the loop and which are fully autonomous, (4) what I'm missing from a security and auditability standpoint, and (5) how I'd present this as a governance proposal to leadership. Here's what we're running: [DESCRIBE YOUR CURRENT AI TOOLS AND WORKFLOWS]"

For individuals building their first agent:

"You are a workflow design consultant. I want to build my first AI agent to handle [DESCRIBE THE WORKFLOW]. Help me think through: (1) what the agent needs to know and access to do this well, (2) where I should keep a human in the loop vs. let it run autonomously, (3) what could go wrong and how I'd catch it, and (4) what tool or platform makes the most sense for where I'm starting. Be specific and practical."

The full Agent Governance Playbook — with an agent inventory template, access control checklist, and a leadership briefing outline — is coming to the AI Templates Library at launch.

👉 Get Early Access → agenticcollective.co

🧠 Learn Something — What's the Difference Between a Managed Agent and One You Build Yourself?

You're going to hear "managed agents" a lot more from here on. Here's what it actually means.

An agent you build yourself: You set up the infrastructure, manage the state, handle errors, and keep it running. Full control. Full responsibility. Requires either engineering resources or significant setup time.

A managed agent: The platform handles the runtime — the memory, the state, the uptime, the sandboxing. You define the goal and the tools. They keep it alive and running. Think of it like the difference between self-hosting a server and using cloud hosting. Same concept, different layer of abstraction.

Why Anthropic's launch matters: Claude Managed Agents at $0.08 per session-hour means a long-running agent that works inside your environment for eight hours costs about 64 cents in runtime — before tokens. A team can now run what used to be enterprise-only infrastructure for a few dollars a day.

The tradeoff: Less control over the environment. More speed to deployment. For most IT and ops use cases — especially at the start — that tradeoff is worth it.

The short version: managed agents lower the barrier to your first deployment. Build something with one. Once you understand the pattern, you'll know when it makes sense to build your own infrastructure.

Next week: I'm walking through the specific agent stack I'd build for an IT ops role in 2026 — tool by tool, decision by decision.

🧑‍💻 Founder Note

II'll be honest — this week's announcements hit different for me personally.

I've been saying for months that the window to get ahead of this is closing. Not because agents are getting harder to use. Because they're getting easier. And when something gets easier, everyone does it — and the people who were slow to move lose the advantage they had.

The IT pros I respect most aren't the ones who know every model. They're the ones who already have a working agent in production, a governance framework in progress, and a pitch ready for when leadership inevitably asks "what are we doing about AI?"

That's exactly what AI Edge is built around. Not theory. Not demos. Deployable systems you can show in a meeting.

Waitlist is open. If you're in IT and you've been thinking about it — now is the time.

🔮 What’s Coming

Next week I'm breaking down:

  • The agent stack I'd build for IT ops in 2026 — tools, architecture, where I'd start

  • How to pitch an AI initiative to leadership without getting a "let's revisit in Q3"

  • The governance question nobody's asking — but should be

👉 Join the AI Edge Waitlist → agenticcollective.co

You're receiving this because you opted in or connected with LavAI. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe anytime.